By Anatoly Fomenko,Paul Bondarosky,Franck Tamdhu,Mike Yagoupov

ALL sun, lunar eclipses pointed out in chronicles presumed to be written sooner than XVI century couldn't and didn't occur on the very time and detailed place stated to us through the traditional authors thereof, who did like lots to emphasize the significance of the development with a few phenomena within the sky. both the authors lied or have been incorrect, or either. Verdict: both the occasions came about another time and a few different position or there has been not anything remarkable within the sky at that very second. Voilà!

"Astronomy vs historical past" crowns rankings of years of meticulous and wide learn played by means of the eminent mathematician Anatoly Fomenko and his colleagues. This learn begun really as a incredible byproduct of Russian-american pageant in Moon exploration, whilst recognized NASA scientist Robert Newton found a truly unusual phenomenon in lunar mechanics.

This e-book is usually the second one quantity in "History: Fiction or Science?" e-series, the basic oeuvre that exposes and expounds the various inveracities of the conventional model of background. The e-series "History: Fiction or Science?" comprises information and conclusions that aren’t something wanting progressive. the choices provided to classical background are gorgeous, unorthodox to the level of being labelled heretical by means of nearly each student of heritage, and bold sufficient to be thought of preposterous in the beginning sight, even supposing this impact by no means lasts longer than it takes one to learn a number of pages attentively.

The writer dissects each old age and analyses the information from each resource that you can think of – Greek and Egyptian chronology take a great beating, and it is going speedily downhill from there. Ticho Brahe, Ptolemy and Copernicus take the blame for developing the legend of a legendary Classical age that by no means used to be and misdating mediaeval occasions by way of 1000's and hundreds of thousands of years as very old ones.

In "Astronomy vs. background" we're reminded of the an important function of eclipses in verifiyng the relationship of significant old occasions, of stone Zodiacs containg the real dates of such occasions. Our conception of historical past starts off to alter dramatically even earlier than we’re via with "Astronomy vs. History".

On one hand, Dr Fomenko et al name all people, historians together with, to aplly the Occam's razor to the area historical past. at the different, the scientists Dr Fomenko et al are able to realize their alleged blunders of recent Chronology idea, to repent and to retract if and basically if:

- radiocarbon courting equipment or dendrochronology move the transparent nameless 'black field' tests;
- astronomic facts refutes their effects on sun eclipses;
- it's confirmed irrefutably that Robert Newton (NASA astrophisist) was once mistaken calling 'ancient' Ptolemy the best conman in historical past in his 'Crime of Claudius Ptolemy' ;

At current historians are usually not keen to use unique sciences toolbox. watch out for the Occam's razor as their beatifull net of lies is just too fragile !

The radiocarbon relationship labs run their very high priced assessments provided that is the pattern to be dated is followed with an concept of age mentioned through historians on foundation of...subjective..mmm...gutfeeling and the heritage books they've been writing for the final four hundred years. Radiocarbon labs fortunately invoice for his or her fiddling and finetuning with C14 to get the dates 'to order' of historians. Circulus viciosus is ideal. attach the dots !

PS : Prescient Saint Augustine warned: 'be cautious of mathematicians, rather after they communicate the truth!'.
Dr Anatoly Fomenko is an entire Member (Academician) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, complete Member of the Russian Academy of ordinary Sciences, complete Member of the overseas greater schooling Academy of Sciences, healthcare professional of Physics and arithmetic, Professor, Head of the Moscow country college division of arithmetic and Mechanics. Solved the classical Plateau's challenge from the idea of

Show description

Read or Download Astronomy vs. History (History: Fiction or Science? Book 2) PDF

Similar logic books

Download PDF by Arie Hinkis: Proofs of the Cantor-Bernstein Theorem: A Mathematical

This ebook bargains an expedition during the developmental zone of study arithmetic. It provides a few forty papers, released among the 1870s and the Nineteen Seventies, on proofs of the Cantor-Bernstein theorem and the comparable Bernstein department theorem. whereas the emphasis is put on supplying actual proofs, just like the originals, the dialogue is broadened to incorporate facets that pertain to the method of the advance of arithmetic and to the philosophy of arithmetic.

Dirk W. Hoffmann's Die Gödel'schen Unvollständigkeitssätze: Eine geführte Reise PDF

Im Jahr 1931 erschien im Monatsheft für Mathematik und Physik ein Artikel mit dem geheimnisvoll klingenden Titel Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. In dieser Arbeit hat Kurt Gödel zwei Unvollständigkeitssätze bewiesen, die unseren Blick auf die Mathematik von Grund auf verändert haben.

Matrix Logic: Theory and Applications - download pdf or read online

During this pioneering paintings, the writer develops a basic formula of common sense when it comes to idea of matrices and vector areas. the invention of matrix good judgment represents a landmark within the additional formalization of common sense. For the 1st time the ability of direct mathematical computation is utilized to the entire set of good judgment operations, permitting the derivation of either the classical and modal logics from an analogous formal base.

Katsumi Inoue,Hayato Ohwada,Akihiro Yamamoto's Inductive Logic Programming: 25th International Conference, PDF

This e-book constitutes the completely refereed post-conference lawsuits of the twenty fifth foreign convention on Inductive common sense Programming, ILP 2015, held in Kyoto, Japan, in August 2015. The 14 revised papers provided have been rigorously reviewed and chosen from forty four submissions. The papers specialise in subject matters similar to theories, algorithms, representations and languages, structures and purposes of ILP, and canopy all parts of studying in good judgment, relational studying, relational facts mining, statistical relational studying, multi-relational facts mining, relational reinforcement studying, graph mining, connections with different studying paradigms, between others.

Additional info for Astronomy vs. History (History: Fiction or Science? Book 2)

Example text

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.95 of 5 – based on 15 votes